Cases 1 - 10 of 255
Poore v. Lammer et al
as 3:2024cv50115
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Poore
Defendant:
Brian Lammer, Jenkins, Borden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lee v. Castanedo et al
as 3:2024cv50112
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee
Defendant:
Michael Castanedo, Samantha Rodriguez and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. Kuchen
as 1:2024cv02350
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Stevenson
Defendant:
Kuchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lee Lua Morales
Defendant:
Hernandez, Cavin and Carl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Hasin et al
as 1:2024cv01082
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lee Lua Morales
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Hasin, Correctional Officer Bravo and Correctional Officer David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Jeffryies et al
as 1:2024cv01204
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee McDonald, Sr. and Mark A Kimbrough
Defendant:
Rob Jeffryies, Donald Terry and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lua Morales v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv15929
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lee Lua Morales
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2023cv15252
Plaintiff:
James Thompson
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Kernel, Tom J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Gomez et al
as 1:2023cv15314
Plaintiff:
James Lee Dorsey
Defendant:
David Gomez, Mr. Osbourn, Marlena Henze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lua Morales v. Byrne et al
as 1:2023cv14307
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lee Lua Morales
Defendant:
Thomas J. Byrne, Thomas Dart and LEASCAF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
