Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Cases 11 - 13 of 13
Hartenbower et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2013cv02253
Plaintiff: Milton Fred Hartenbower , Catherine A. Hartenbower , Hart Electric, LLC and others
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services , Kathleen Sebelius , United States Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lindsay, et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2013cv01210
Plaintiff: Lindsay, Rappaport and Postel, LLC and William C Lindsay
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services , Kathleen Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs. , United States Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
R. Daniel Conlon, Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Joliet, Illinois, as Successor Trustee Under the Provisions of the Trust Agreement Dated December 31, 1949 et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Departm Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03932
Plaintiff: R. Daniel Conlon, Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Joliet, Illinois, as Successor Trustee Under the Provisions of the Trust Agreement Dated December 31, 1949, Catholic Charities Diocese of Joliet, Inc., The Most Reverend Thomas John Paprocki, Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Springfield-in-Illinois and others
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Hilda Solis, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, Timothy Geithner, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae: American Center For Law & Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?