Cases 11 - 20 of 247
Pittman v. Halloran et al
as 1:2023cv14786
Plaintiff:
Marcelous Pittman
Defendant:
John Halloran, James O'Brien, Michael Clancy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Manning et al v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Manning, Christine Crawford, Keith Manning and others
Defendant:
McDonald's USA, LLC and McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Claybron v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07047
Plaintiff:
Eson Claybron
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07001
Plaintiff:
Joshua King
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06999
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Culverson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06394
Plaintiff:
Damien Culverson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
