Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Haymer v. City Of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv04504
Plaintiff:
Eric Haymer
Defendant:
City Of Chicago Police Department, Officer Preg and Unknown Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Williams v. P.O. Carter, #16352 et al
as 1:2015cv03511
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
P.O. Bishop, P.O. Carter, Officers John Doe and others
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lane v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv01920
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lane
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Officer John Doe and Officer Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv08296
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart , Cara Smith , Sharon A. Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark J. Neiweem v. Officer Carter et al
as 1:2014cv06116
Defendant:
Officer Carter, Officer Carol, Officer Hodgeman and others
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Neiweem
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray et al v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2014cv01308
Plaintiff:
Dejohn McCray and Chicago Police Officer John Doe
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Minor v. Officers John Doe 1-2
as 1:2014cv00616
Plaintiff:
Bodarius Minor
Defendant:
Officers John Doe 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liam Cunningham v. Officers John Doe 1-4
as 1:2013cv08893
Plaintiff:
Liam Cunningham
Defendant:
Officers John Doe 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fernando Fernandez v. Sgt. Green et al
as 1:2013cv07003
Plaintiff:
Fernando Fernandez
Defendant:
Sgt. Green, Officer Jefferson, Officer John Doe and others
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Summit Police officer John Doe et al
as 1:2013cv06620
Plaintiff:
Rangel Gomez
Defendant:
Summit Police officer John Doe and Village of Summit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
