Cases 81 - 90 of 102
Collier v. Governor of the State of Illinois et al
as 1:2008cv04090
Plaintiff:
Martha Collier
Defendant:
Rob J. Blagojevich, Walter Jacobsen, Bankers Life And Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stith et al v. Stith et al
as 1:2008cv02089
Plaintiff:
Toni Stith and Ge'Ton Stith
Defendant:
Gerald Stith, Vikki Lynn Johnson, Law Offices of Jeffery M. Leving, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chodor v. City of Chicago
as 1:2008cv03463
Plaintiff:
Walter A. Chodor
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stamps et al v. Does 1-8 et al
as 1:2008cv02196
Plaintiff:
Collette Stamps, Collette Stamps, Nichol Stamps and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-8 and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brzowski v. Elgin Mental Health Center
as 1:2008cv01434
Plaintiff:
Walter J Brzowski
Defendant:
Elgin Mental Health Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perkins et al v. Schmitt et al
as 3:2008cv50033
Plaintiff:
Walter Keith Perkins and Susan P. Perkins
Defendant:
Richard W. Schmitt, Robert Fulwider, Randy Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sloan v. Village of Hickory Hills, Illinois et al
as 1:2007cv07038
Plaintiff:
Walter Sloan
Defendant:
Village of Hickory Hills, Illinois, Alan Vodicka, Joseph Roscetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carlos-El v. Devine et al
as 1:2007cv05914
Plaintiff:
Walter Steven Carlos-El
Defendant:
Richard A. Devine, Officer/Sgt. Gill, Officer/Sgt. Mersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walters v. Bratek et al
as 1:2007cv06291
Plaintiff:
Anthony Walters and Anthony Walters
Defendant:
C. Bratek and T. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
