Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Forbes v. Ballard
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
James Forbes
Defendant:
Robin Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones-Redmond v. Thornton Fractional Township H.S. Dist. 215 et al
as 1:2023cv05010
Plaintiff:
Sophia Jones-Redmond
Defendant:
Thornton Fractional H.S. Dist. 215, Richard Dust, Patricia Stepp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Alexis v. The State of Illinois System of Employment under S-O-R et al
as 1:2020cv05536
Defendant:
The State of Illinois System of Employment under S-O-R, Illinois State Police and Chicago Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Ballard Alexis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Garrett v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv05176
Plaintiff:
Cheyenne Garrett
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, Daniel Skupien, Perry Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lindsay v. McClintock, Star #8225 et al
as 1:2017cv03399
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lindsay
Defendant:
Chicago Police Officer Michael McClintock, Star #8225, Chicago Police Officer Perry Ballard, Star #12444, Chicago Police Officer Ryan Winfrey, Star #19585 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
