Cases 1 - 10 of 5,546
Weekly v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04752
Plaintiff:
London Weekly
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Whitfield v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04667
Plaintiff:
Corris A Whitfield
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Officer John J. Salinas, Anthony Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bailey v. Vecchio et al
as 1:2024cv04629
Plaintiff:
Martin Bailey
Defendant:
Joseph D Vecchio and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Almanza v. City of DeKalb et al
as 1:2024cv04567
Plaintiff:
Veronica Almanza
Defendant:
City of DeKalb, Officer Diego Casas and Officer Betsy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Almanza v. City of DeKalb et al
as 3:2024cv50219
Plaintiff:
Veronica Almanza
Defendant:
City of DeKalb, Officer Diego Casas and Officer Betsy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Dillard v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04396
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Dillard, II
Defendant:
City of Chicago, CW Martin, Jr and M K Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
