Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Grubbs v. Great Lakes Academy Charter School et al
as 1:2017cv06204
Plaintiff:
Charonda Grubbs
Defendant:
Great Lakes Academy Charter School, Katherine Myers and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv11515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv08258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gomez et al v. Garda CL Great Lakes, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01002
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gomez and Adam Hedberg
Defendant:
Garda CL Great Lakes, Inc. , Village of Broadview , Dave Irkovitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Israel, et al v. British Petroleum Refinery
as 1:2007cv04150
Plaintiff:
Rabbi K. A. Israel, Bio-Chemical-Molecular and Agricultural Genetics, Citizens of the State of Illinois, Water Users of Lake Michigan and The Great Lakes and others
Defendant:
British Petroleum Refinery and B.P. Pipeline of North America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
