Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Meakens v. Walsh et al
as 1:2023cv17164
Plaintiff:
Lamar M Meakens
Defendant:
Ann Celine O'Hallare Walsh, Lee J. Roupas and Candice Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamar v. Joswick et al
as 3:2023cv50334
Plaintiff:
Randy Lamar
Defendant:
City of Savanna Police Officers/ Lieutenants Shea Joswick, Nicholas Meeker and DNR Trooper Hofftender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowens v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv00278
Defendant:
Police Officers, Sean Bottom, #18938, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz et al v. Foxx et al
as 1:2019cv02923
Plaintiff:
Keisha Allen (legal name Wayne Allen), Kamora Lovelace (legal name Latuan Walker), Eisha Latrice Love (legal name Darveris Lamar Love) and others
Defendant:
Sharon M. Sullivan, Timothy C. Evans and Kimberly M. Foxx
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv10864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lipscomb v. Rockford Police Dept. et al
as 3:2012cv50327
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Lamar Lipscomb
Defendant:
Rockford Police Dept., Schmidt, Schuman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06947
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chapman v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2008cv07133
Plaintiff:
Lamar C. Chapman, III
Defendant:
State of Illinois, County of Cook, Lawrence Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
