Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Weinert v. Lemont Police Dept.
as 1:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
Robert C Weinert
Defendant:
Lemont Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Michael et al v. Letchinger et al
as 1:2010cv03897
Plaintiff:
George Michael , Susan Michael , Dorothy Michael and others
Defendant:
Christine Letchinger, R. Drew Irvin, Gerald Nellessen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Ivy v. McCarty et al
as 1:2007cv05447
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ivy and Jordan Ivy
Defendant:
Robert C McCarty, Livingston County, Unknown and Unnamed Livingston County Deputies/Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Anderson et al
as 1:2007cv04624
Plaintiff:
Robert C Thomas
Defendant:
Christine Anderson, Cass R. Buscher, Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
