Cases 31 - 40 of 1,983
Martinez-Vivanco v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv50244
Plaintiff:
Wilibaldo Martinez-Vivanco
Defendant:
United States of America and Brywer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hubbard v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv50238
Petitioner:
Quincy Hubbard
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Blanco v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2023cv50230
Petitioner:
Edgar Blanco
Respondent:
United States Of America, Lt. Marquez, C.O. Leeper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Davis
as 1:2023cv03620
Plaintiff:
DaRayl D Davis and United States of America
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Diaz-Perez v. Kinnick et al
as 3:2023cv50173
Plaintiff:
Bernard Diaz-Perez
Defendant:
Mr. Kinnick, Mr. Moissant, United States Of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Garcia
as 1:2023cv02822
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Omar Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Muhammad-Curtis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv02761
Petitioner:
Lenolis Muhammad-Curtis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States Of America v. Leavy
as 3:2023cv50137
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Darnell Leavy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Blount
as 1:2023cv02530
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Domingo Blount
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
United States of America v. Kowalski
as 1:2023cv02542
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert M. Kowalski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
