Cases 51 - 60 of 1,942
Gonzalez v. Fromm et al
as 1:2023cv16475
Plaintiff:
Jorge Gonzalez
Defendant:
Neal Fromm, Dr. Andrew West, Dr. Vipin Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Doe #1-12 et al
as 1:2023cv15751
Plaintiff:
Martin Lyons
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1-12, Wexford Health Sources Inc and John Doe #1-9
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Nodine et al
as 1:2023cv16725
Plaintiff:
DeLaurence Robinson
Defendant:
Lt. S Nodine, Lt. Sykes, Lt. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enochs v. Bocknak et al
as 1:2023cv14811
Plaintiff:
Damarques Debrante Enochs
Defendant:
Ron Haine, A. Bocknak, F. Byndum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almanza v. Pastupaka et al
as 1:2023cv15665
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Almanza
Defendant:
Artyom Pastupaka, John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stidwell v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16672
Plaintiff:
Devon Stidwell
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Terry Hake, Shawn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv16292
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Deon Coleman
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, E Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffries v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv15097
Plaintiff:
Dante Jeffries
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv14756
Plaintiff:
Darvell D Davis
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Peterson and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flanagan v. Co Greenbaum
as 1:2023cv16126
Plaintiff:
Marvin Flanagan
Defendant:
Co Greenbaum, Co Rimsek, Co Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
