Cases 81 - 90 of 23,855
Pitts v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv04187
Plaintiff:
Herbert Pitts
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections, Mikutis B. and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Cook County Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv04206
Plaintiff:
Alana N. Carroll
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50190
Plaintiff:
Marquis Saed Allen
Defendant:
Andrea Tack, Arthur Manzano and Jane Or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04199
Plaintiff:
Pierre Lamar Garrett
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Pollock and Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castleberry v. Zahtz et al
as 3:2024cv50187
Plaintiff:
Steven Castleberry
Defendant:
Merrill J Zahtz, Wexford Health Source, Monica Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Common v. Beauty Supply Owner et al
as 1:2024cv02860
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Common
Defendant:
Beauty Supply Owner and Occupant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunford v. Leon et al
as 1:2024cv04166
Plaintiff:
Darren A Lunford
Defendant:
Pedro Leon, S. Miller, T. Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04172
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Amador, Kehoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Warden, USP Thomson et al
as 3:2024cv50188
Plaintiff:
Kenneth White
Defendant:
Warden, USP Thomson and R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Alegria et al
as 1:2024cv02851
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Marquise Phelps
Defendant:
A Alegria, T Berecz and J Guevara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
