Cases 1 - 10 of 1,683
Williams v. Truitt
as 1:2024cv04703
Plaintiff:
Tony Williams
Defendant:
Warden Charles Truitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mitchell
as 3:2024cv50218
Plaintiff:
Marvin Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milons v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04620
Plaintiff:
Deandree Milons
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Correctional Sergeant Williams and John/Jane Doe #1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benedict v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50214
Plaintiff:
William Byron Benedict
Defendant:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ortega et al
as 1:2024cv04485
Plaintiff:
Tyrie Williams
Defendant:
Elvis Ortega, Kevin Stephans, Paul Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. University of Illinois at Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04177
Plaintiff:
Durwyn Talley
Defendant:
University of Illinois at Chicago, Barbara Young, Kirbylee Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. The City of Cherry Valley et al
as 3:2024cv50196
Plaintiff:
William Chatman
Defendant:
The City of Cherry Valley, Cherry Valley Police Department, The City Of Rockford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04172
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Amador, Kehoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50176
Plaintiff:
Dan Smith
Defendant:
Director Latoya Hughes, Warden Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2024cv03822
Plaintiff:
Amireon Williams
Defendant:
John D. Idleburg, N. Kalfas and Gholar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
