Cases 1 - 10 of 3,257
Ashetzie v. People of The State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv04621
Plaintiff:
George Ashetzie
Defendant:
People of The State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing et al v. Byrd et al
as 3:2024cv50213
Plaintiff:
Javion Ewing and Jazariah Lyles
Defendant:
David Byrd, City of DeKalb, DeKalb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. United States
as 1:2024cv04528
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bowen
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Scott v. Budde et al
as 1:2024cv04483
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Budde, James W. Glasgow, Will County Shaffs Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Clay
as 1:2024cv04217
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carleous Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Vinet v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03807
Petitioner:
Richard J. Vinet
Respondent:
State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Gary
as 1:2024cv03818
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Gary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
King v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03704
Petitioner:
Andre King
Respondent:
of America United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Baldwin v. Crow et al
as 1:2024cv03626
Petitioner:
Derrick Anthony Angelos Baldwin
Respondent:
Christel Crow, Kimberly Hvarre and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
