Cases 1 - 10 of 32
White v. Warden, USP Thomson et al
as 3:2024cv50188
Plaintiff:
Kenneth White
Defendant:
Warden, USP Thomson and R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibarra-Medina v. Warden of USP Thomson
as 1:2023cv15066
Petitioner:
Ibarra Medina Armando and Armando Ibarra-Medina
Respondent:
Warden of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Warden, USP Thomson
as 3:2023cv50018
Petitioner:
Tyrese Smith
Respondent:
Warden, USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Larrabee v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50446
Petitioner:
Jonathan Wayne Larrabee
Respondent:
T. Bergami and T. Bergami, Warden, USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McNatt v. Bergami
as 3:2022cv50277
Petitioner:
Christopher McNatt
Respondent:
Warden, USP Thomson and Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Farrington v.Bergami
as 3:2022cv50250
Petitioner:
Tavares L. Farrington
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman I, Thomas Bergami and D. Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rivera v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv03545
Plaintiff:
Jasper Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America, FBOP - USP Thomson and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Baldwin v. Administrative USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv50235
Petitioner:
Reginald Baldwin
Respondent:
Administrative USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gorbey v. Warden, USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv50163
Petitioner:
Michael Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gorbey v. USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv50160
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
