Cases 1 - 10 of 2,163
King v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03704
Petitioner:
Andre King
Respondent:
of America United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States of America v. Gary
as 1:2024cv03818
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Gary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Patrick v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv50165
Petitioner:
Lonzo Patrick
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States of America v. Cole
as 1:2024cv02804
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brandon Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
McKinney v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv50111
Plaintiff:
Ronald McKinney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D.W. v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 1:2024cv01870
Plaintiff:
D.W.
Defendant:
United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa and Susan Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tounisi v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Abdella Ahmad Tounisi
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. United States of Corp et al
as 1:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
Brittnay Stewart
Defendant:
United States of Corp, Thor Martin, William Gamboney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Dickey
as 1:2024cv01047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tracie Dickey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Poitra v. The United States
as 3:2024cv50041
Plaintiff:
Joshua John Poitra
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
