Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Battle v. Faulkner et al
as 1:2018cv02222
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Bruce Faulkner, Randy Pfister, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv02225
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Statesville Mailroom Department, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Randy et al
as 1:2018cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Pfister Randy, Officer Romann, Officer Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Statesville NRC Mental Health Administration, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathews v. Deltaura USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07560
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Mathews
Defendant:
Deltaura USA, Inc., David Paramsothy and Jonily Jovan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Battle v. Pfister et al
as 1:2017cv06928
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Dr. Sood, Lt. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Pfister et al
as 1:2017cv06338
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Garner, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 1:2017cv04051
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battle v. Officer Luster et al
as 1:2017cv02176
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Officer Luster, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Officer Luster et al
as 1:2016cv09767
Plaintiff:
Jovan Miguel Battle
Defendant:
Officer Luster, John Doe and The Metra Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
