Cases 21 - 30 of 861
Lake v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv50144
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Attorney General and McHenry County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farag v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02728
Plaintiff:
Tarek Farag
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ly v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv01951
Plaintiff:
Lan Tieu Ly
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Director of USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
