Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv02630
Plaintiff:
Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhao Feng, zhang zhang hui and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarter v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01063
Plaintiff:
Clyde McCarter
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc. , Abbott Laboratories, Inc. , AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earl v. Howard et al
as 1:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
Clyde Earl
Defendant:
Jonathan J. Howard , Steve Paschos , Tushar Advani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl v. Espejo et al
as 1:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
Clyde Earl
Defendant:
Antonio Espejo , Juan Gali , Arturo Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv10101
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bell
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Cook County Sheriff, County Of Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06355
Plaintiff:
Clyde Stone
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Com-ed Electric Company at , al et al
as 1:2016cv05386
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
Com-ed Electric Comapny and The Exelon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dodson v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05087
Plaintiff:
Clyde Dodson
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. City of Chicago, The et al
as 1:2016cv04094
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Com-ed Electric Company at , al and The Exelon Corporation at, al, al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
