Cases 31 - 40 of 96
Fakhouri v. Cioli et al
as 3:2021cv50104
Respondent:
Cioli and USP Thomson Federal Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Samir Fakhouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bussie et al v. Warden at USP Marion, Ill et al
as 1:2021cv01572
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie and Ceasar Sayoc
Respondent:
Judge Jeb Rakoff and Warden at USP Marion, Ill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oscar v. USP Thomson
as 3:2021cv50013
Respondent:
USP Thomson
Petitioner:
Jean Oscar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fakhouri v. Cioli et al
as 1:2021cv01172
Respondent:
Cioli and USP Thomson Federal Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Samir Fakhouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. Warden At USP Thomson
as 3:2021cv50051
Respondent:
Warden At USP Thomson
Petitioner:
Robert Ebey Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jean v. Ciolli
as 3:2021cv50020
Plaintiff:
Johnny Tahja Jean
Defendant:
Warden USP Thomson and Chris Rivers
Respondent:
Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Birkos v. Sykes
as 1:2020cv05325
Plaintiff:
Roksana Birkos
Defendant:
Dominique Sykes Individually and as Agent of United States Postal Service d/b/a USPS Postal Service d/b/a USPS d/b/a Postal Service, Dominique Sykes Individually and as Agent of United States Postal Service doing business as USPS doing business as Postal Service and United States Postal Service individually doing business as USPS doing business as Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis, Jr. v. Thomson
as 3:2020cv50002
Respondent:
USP Thomson
Petitioner:
Frankie Cornell Ellis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fonville v. Rivers
as 3:2019cv50324
Defendant:
Thomson USP Warden
Plaintiff:
Kendan Fonville
Respondent:
Chris Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quoyah v. Hudson
as 3:2019cv50291
Respondent:
Thomson USP Warden and Donald Hudson
Petitioner:
Gabriel Alexander Quoyah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
