Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Rodgers v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv10921
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Deandre Rodgers
Defendant:
Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott v. Scott et al
as 3:2016cv50183
Plaintiff:
Brendan G. Elliott
Defendant:
Rodger Scott, Joyce Klein, Caroline Parnow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Hyundai of Matteson LLC
as 1:2016cv05821
Plaintiff:
Lisa Robinson and Lester Rodgers
Defendant:
Hyundai of Matteson LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv04908
Plaintiff:
Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Li Chen, 454ngyu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rodgers v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2016cv01786
Plaintiff:
Gary Rodgers
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodgers v. Actavis, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01616
Plaintiff:
Bruce Rodgers
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. Schultz et al
as 1:2015cv08560
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nelson
Defendant:
Bruce R Schultz and Jon K Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodgers et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07558
Plaintiff:
Howard Rodgers and Debra Rodgers
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthapaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodgers v. Capital One Bank (U.S.A), N.A.
as 1:2015cv04629
Plaintiff:
Randy Rodgers
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (U.S.A), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
