Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Donelson v. McCluster et al
as 1:2018cv02597
Petitioner: Charles Donelson
Respondent: Christopher McCluster, Boton, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donelson v. Tanner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv08078
Plaintiff: Charles Donelson
Defendant: Q. Tanner, Saleh Obaisi, Latonya Wiiiams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Charles Donelson
as 1:2016cv07410
In_re: Charles Donelson
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Donelson v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv10295
Plaintiff: Charles Donelson
Defendant: Tom Dart, Supt. Martinez, Cermak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donelson v. Engleson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01249
Plaintiff: Charles Donelson
Defendant: Tracy Engleson, Reed, Pat Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donelson v. Lemke et al
as 1:2014cv00928
Plaintiff: Charles Donelson
Respondent: Michael Lemke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donelson v. Ramos et al
as 1:2009cv06768
Petitioner: Charles Donelson
Respondent: Anthony A. Ramos and Nedra Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donelson v. Prado et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv06227
Plaintiff: Charles Donelson
Defendant: Jose M. Prado, C/O Dever, C/O Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donelson v. Shaw et al
as 1:2009cv03628
Plaintiff: Charles Donelson
Defendant: Frank Shaw and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donelson v. Shaw et al
as 1:2009cv02560
Plaintiff: Charles Donelson
Defendant: Frank Shaw, Nedra Chandler and Roger E Walker, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?