Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Solis v. Yazoo City USP et al
as 1:2024cv04905
Petitioner:
Leonel Solis
Respondent:
Yazoo City USP and FCI Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 3:2024cv50139
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carrillo et al v. Brendan Mortgage, Incorporated et al
as 1:2023cv16613
Plaintiff:
Emilio Carrillo and Michelle Ann Carrillo
Defendant:
Brendan Mortgage, Incorporated doing business as Brendan Financial, Scott Robert Barfuss, Father & Sons Home Improvement II, Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
McKinney v. FCI Marianna Prison Officials et al
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Michael McKinney
Defendant:
FCI Marianna Prison Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sykes v. Warden, FCI Thomson
as 1:2022cv02210
Petitioner:
Terrance Sykes
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06405
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Waller v. NDF1, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv06090
Defendant:
FCI Lender Services, Inc., NDF1, LLC and Land Home Financial Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roy Waller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herrin v. FCI Lender Services, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01928
Plaintiff:
William D. Herrin
Defendant:
FCI Lender Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03265
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00456
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
