Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Lewis v. AFAM Concept Inc. dba JF Labs Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv15966
Plaintiff:
Tonya M Lewis
Defendant:
AFAM Concept Inc. dba JF Labs Inc., Revlon Consumer Products, Inc., Revlon Group Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. Avlon Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv15689
Plaintiff:
Viola M. Lewis
Defendant:
Avlon Industries, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC ., House of Cheatham LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10259
Plaintiff:
Roshon M. Lewis
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Loreal USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. Kalbhen et al
as 1:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Lewis
Defendant:
Janet Kalbhen and Vantius, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lewis v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00892
Plaintiff:
Alginon M. Lewis
Defendant:
Andrew Marshall Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
McLaurin et al v. Lewis et al
as 3:2018cv50398
Plaintiff:
David McLaurin and Isaac Thompson
Defendant:
Joshua M Lewis and Robert P Lewis
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Lewis v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv07804
Plaintiff:
Lois M. Lewis
Defendant:
Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Cook County Dept. Of Corr. et al
as 1:2017cv02429
Plaintiff:
Megan M. Lewis
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. Of Corr. and Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv11367
Plaintiff:
Juan M. Lewis
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Toni Preckwinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath v. Lewis et al
as 1:2015cv08440
Plaintiff:
Brian Heath
Defendant:
Robert M. Lewis , USF Holland, Inc. and YRC Worldwide Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
