Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Citizens Insurance Company of the Midwest v. Sears Roebuck & Company, et al
as 1:2012cv06901
Plaintiff:
Citizens Insurance Company of the Midwest
Defendant:
LG Electronics, USA, Inc and Sears Roebuck & Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
U.S. Bank, National Association v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv05369
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Benjamin J Johnson, Capital One Bank (USA) NA, Chicago Commerce Acceptance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Sears, Roebuck, & Company
as 1:2011cv01929
Plaintiff:
Charmane Smith
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck, & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northfield Insurance Company v. Sears Roebuck & Company et al
as 1:2010cv05831
Plaintiff:
Northfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Company, Louise Bradley and Earleen Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hui Chuan Liao et al v. Colovos Company et al
as 1:2009cv03402
Plaintiff:
Hui Chuan Liao, Hui Chuan Liao, Nanjing Jieshencheng M&E Co., Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Colovos Company, Sears, Roebuck Company and W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sears, Roebuck & Company et al v. Comdot Internet Services Private Limited et al
as 1:2008cv03959
Plaintiff:
Sears, Roebuck & Company, Sears, Roebuck & Company, Sears, Roebuck & Company and others
Defendant:
Comdot Internet Services Private Limited and craftsmanclub.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
In Re Sears, Roebuck & Company Tools Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2005cv04742
In Re:
Sears, Roebuck & Company Tools Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
