Cases 1 - 10 of 629
Benedict v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50214
Plaintiff:
William Byron Benedict
Defendant:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Leavenworth Penitentiary et al
as 3:2024cv50200
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bell
Defendant:
Leavenworh Penitentiary, Warden D. Hudson, McMillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Warden, USP Thomson et al
as 3:2024cv50188
Plaintiff:
Kenneth White
Defendant:
Warden, USP Thomson and R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Dalke et al
as 3:2024cv50180
Plaintiff:
John J. Murphy
Defendant:
Lt. Dalke, Lt. Remers and Warden Of Dixon C.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50176
Plaintiff:
Dan Smith
Defendant:
Director Latoya Hughes, Warden Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Facility Dixon C.C. et al
as 3:2024cv50173
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
Facility Dixon C.C., Construction Trade Worker, Contract Incorporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2024cv50161
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Warden Gonzales, Andre Matevousian, Timothy Moisant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodloe v. Matevousion et al
as 3:2024cv50138
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Respondent:
Andre Matevousion, Warden Thomas E. Bargami and B. Potes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 3:2024cv50139
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Singleton v. Warden Williams et al
as 1:2024cv02791
Plaintiff:
Dirk D. Singleton
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Stateville/NRC, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
