Cases 61 - 70 of 137
Clark v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2017cv01152
Plaintiff:
Hillary Clark
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Zhao v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00454
Plaintiff:
Yong Juan Zhao
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
v. The United States of America
as 3:2016cv01236
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Kelleher v. Boeing Company, et al
as 3:2015cv00893
Defendant:
Beazer East, Inc., CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kelleher
Cross Defendant:
Sprinkmann Insulation Inc., United Technologies Corporation and Rohr Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00541
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Breeding v. USA
as 3:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
Shayvonne Breeding
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Smith v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Janel N. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Mcallister v. Washington University et al
as 3:2015cv00001
Plaintiff:
Janet Mcallister
Defendant:
Washington University, Barnes-Jewish Hospital , BJC Home Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Buffo v. United States Steel Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv01116
Plaintiff:
Antonio Buffo
Defendant:
United States Steel Corporation , Granite City Works Management Club and Carl Cannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America et al v. Ahmad et al
as 3:2014cv00369
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Illinois, Kelsi Chick and others
Defendant:
Maqbool Ahmad, Keith Tyhurst, Marion Eye Center, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
