Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Rednour v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
Rachel Rednour
Defendant:
Ralph Jones, Jeremy Kempfer, Eric Steely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keesey v. Randle et al
as 3:2010cv00108
Plaintiff:
Sheila Keesey
Defendant:
Michael P Randle, Lee Ryker and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Willenborg v. Ozier et al
as 3:2009cv01002
Plaintiff:
Mindy Willenborg
Defendant:
Stephen F. Ozier, Cumberland County Sheriff's Department and Cumberland County Sheriff's Deputy John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews et al v. City of East St. Louis, Illinois et al
as 3:2009cv00870
Plaintiff:
Anthony Matthews, Robert Gillespie and Christopher Doby
Defendant:
City of East St. Louis, Illinois, John Doe, Club Casino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nixon v. Allen et al
as 3:2009cv00686
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Nixon
Defendant:
James Allen, Walter Martin, Gary Craig, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Densmore et al
as 3:2009cv00569
Plaintiff:
John Kelly
Defendant:
Richard Densmore, Jamie Ramsey and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Huster v. Crimm et al
as 3:2009cv00218
Plaintiff:
Peter Huster
Defendant:
Timothy Crimm, John Doe, Richard Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burton v. Doe et al
as 3:2008cv00793
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Burton
Defendant:
John Doe and Michael Delaney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rogers v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2008cv00372
Plaintiff:
Cortez Rogers
Defendant:
Travis Montgomery, John Doe, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barnes et al v. Broy et al
as 3:2008cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michelle Barnes and Brian Ramsey
Defendant:
Charles Broy, Mark Lawson, Jason Serrils and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
