Cases 31 - 40 of 1,627
Jeude v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
USA, United States Marshalls Service, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huckabee v. Shoopman et al
as 3:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
John Huckabee
Defendant:
Richard Shoopman, Austin Zanger, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. Woodside et al
as 3:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Darrion Brown
Defendant:
Lt Woodside, C/O Cook, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. BOP et al
as 3:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
BOP, USA, S Holem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tatum v. Criage et al
as 3:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tatum
Defendant:
C/O Criage, Lt. Bradford, Lt Auston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClendon v. Sankey et al
as 3:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Duane McClendon
Defendant:
Shaquille Sankey, John Doe and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huckabee v. Giacomo
as 3:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
John Huckabee
Defendant:
Zorian Trusewych, Morgan Giacomo, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01158
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lipscomb v. Carbondale Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Carbondale Memorial Hospital, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
