Cases 31 - 40 of 754
Mitchell v. Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv03255
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Mitchell
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd, Williams Lay and C/O Warfel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv03229
Plaintiff:
Jamie Phillips
Defendant:
James Johnson, Joseph Gwaltney, Tyson Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv03187
Plaintiff:
Jamal Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Williams, C/O Little and C/O Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Conn et al
as 3:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Jay Robert Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Waters et al
as 3:2023cv03062
Plaintiff:
William Easley
Defendant:
Waters, Ryan Hughes and D. Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bass v. Harber
as 3:2023cv03008
Plaintiff:
Barnett William Bass
Defendant:
Kimberly Harber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frakes v. Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv02963
Plaintiff:
William L Frankes and William L Frakes
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd, Wexford Medical Group, Sargent Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv02834
Plaintiff:
Eric Sanders
Defendant:
Russell L Williams, Sgt. Sullivan, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Bennett et al
as 3:2023cv02662
Plaintiff:
Diandre Marquis Taylor
Defendant:
Patrick Bennett and William Weier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv02652
Plaintiff:
Clifford C Roberts
Defendant:
Jacob E Williams, C/O Edwards, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
