Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 754
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv01458
Petitioner: Barry Chester Williams
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davison v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv01443
Plaintiff: Terell Davison
Defendant: Carothers Bailey, Mark Williams and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frese v. Little et al
as 3:2024cv01396
Plaintiff: William Frese, Jr
Defendant: Gregory D Little, Diane Skorch and Adjustment Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Grimes et al
as 3:2024cv01367
Plaintiff: Alvin E. Jefferson
Defendant: Tammy Grimes, Captain Collins, C/O Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv01257
Plaintiff: Jessie Williams
Defendant: David Mitchell, Latoya Hughes and Richard Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01224
Petitioner: William Charles Graham
Respondent: T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant: Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff: Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01110
Petitioner: William Charles Graham
Respondent: T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clark v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01078
Plaintiff: Orlandus Clark
Defendant: L. Williams and Leanna Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Williams
as 3:2024cv01049
Plaintiff: Agualar Lewis
Defendant: Warden Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?