Cases 21 - 30 of 727
Anderson v. Texas et al
as 3:2023cv03550
Not Classified By Court:
Juan V Anderson
Defendant:
State of Texas, Waller County Texas, David Mace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. Watson et al
as 3:2023cv03470
Plaintiff:
Jim F. Lanier
Defendant:
Richard Watson and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2023cv03393
Plaintiff:
Ayande Andrews
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jiggets v. The Collegial Review Process et al
as 3:2023cv03348
Plaintiff:
Wesley Jiggets
Defendant:
The Collegial Review Process, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Luking et al
as 3:2023cv03186
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Wilson
Defendant:
Carissa Luking, Yoko Savino, A Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dagans v. Does 1 et al
as 3:2023cv03154
Plaintiff:
Jerrold Dagans
Defendant:
John/Jane Does 1, John/Jane Does 2, Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Conn et al
as 3:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Jay Robert Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attaway v. J.D. Byrider Dealership et al
as 3:2023cv03083
Plaintiff:
Michael N.B. Attaway
Defendant:
J.D. Byrider Dealership, KIA Motor Company, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Armour v. Dolce et al
as 3:2023cv03072
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Armour
Defendant:
Connie Dolce, Angie Crane, Dearmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
Malik Shabazz
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Letoya Hughes, Debbie Issacs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
