Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Carr v. Shah et al
as 3:2017cv00208
Plaintiff:
Ransom Cody Carr
Defendant:
Vipin Shah, Wexford Healthcare Sources and Phil Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shroder v. Shah et al
as 3:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jason Shroder
Defendant:
Vipin Shah, Phil Martin and Wexford Healthcare Sources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Shah et al
as 3:2016cv01308
Plaintiff:
Osia Fernandez
Defendant:
Vipin Shah, Phil Martin and Wexford Health Care Sources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Wexford Health Care Sources et al
as 3:2016cv01294
Plaintiff:
Marcus Rogers
Defendant:
Wexford Health Care Sources, Dr. Shah, Phil Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Green Trac, LLC
as 3:2016mc00076
Plaintiff:
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund , Brandon Flinn , Danny Jenkins and others
Defendant:
Green Trac, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Cunningham v. IDOC et al
as 3:2016cv00840
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Cunningham
Defendant:
IDOC, S.A. Goinez, Warden Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shamburger et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00478
Plaintiff:
Sydney Shamburger , Lewis Campbell, Jr. , Dennis Northcutt and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harvey, Jr. v. Duncan et al
as 3:2016cv00343
Plaintiff:
Bryant H Harvey, Jr.
Defendant:
Stephen B Duncan, Beth Tredway, John Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00314
Plaintiff:
Harley T Miller
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., John Baldwin, Stephen Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pegues v. Coe et al
as 3:2016cv00239
Plaintiff:
Adam Pegues
Defendant:
John Coe, Phil Martin, Stephen Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
