Cases 1 - 10 of 733
Pawelkowski v. Lawrence Correctional Center et al
as 3:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Leszek Pawelkowski
Defendant:
Lawrence Correctional Center, T Fitzgerald, DeeDee Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barmore v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Barmore
Defendant:
P. Myers, Stevens, M Foureh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Doe 1
as 3:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Haslett
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gully
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sadler et al
as 3:2024cv01385
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson
Defendant:
B. Sadler, Wexford Corporate, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaizuka v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01357
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Kaizuka
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron U.S.A Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montanez v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Pierre A. Montanez
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Bob Blum, Angela Lankford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Carbondale Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Carbondale Memorial Hospital, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
