Cases 1 - 10 of 747
Wakefield v. Scoble et al
as 3:2024cv02150
Defendant:
Dr. Ibraheim, Sue Mason, Megan Duiguid and others
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Wakefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz-Perez v. Myers
as 3:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
Martin Munoz-Perez
Defendant:
Dr Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sillas v. Meyers et al
as 3:2024cv01778
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Kelly Rison, Tammy Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Stanton Sillas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01763
Defendant:
Dr Myers, Latoya Hughes, Wexford and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01740
Defendant:
John 1 Doe, Lt. Dudek, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Davila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffee v. Wexford Healthcare et al
as 3:2024cv01705
Plaintiff:
Lazerrick Coffee
Defendant:
Dr. Myers, Mrs. Desai and Nurse Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blake v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01698
Defendant:
J. Smallwood, Wexford Health Sources Inc and Dr Khan
Plaintiff:
Johnie Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bogle v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv01652
Defendant:
Sheriff Justin Oliver, Justin Ebbing, Roger Zimmerman and others
Plaintiff:
Kurt Bogle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Munoz v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01664
Plaintiff:
Gustavo A Munoz
Defendant:
Alexandria Brown, John/Jane Doe, Ashley Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Barwick et al
as 3:2024cv01649
Defendant:
Dr. Percy Myers, John Barwick and IDOC
Plaintiff:
Barry Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
