Cases 1 - 10 of 3,054
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
United States of America v. Sellers
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Wesley Sellers, III
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853 Forfeiture Property - Firearms
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
White v. Gore et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Defendant:
Gore, Lt. Gore, Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guy v. White et al
as 1:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Dante D Guy and Dante Guy
Defendant:
Steven White and M Morson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timken Gears & Services, Inc. v. White
as 2:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Timken Gears & Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph White and Brad Foote Gear Works, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Scanland v. Indiana Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
Michael Scanland
Defendant:
Indiana Dept of Corrections, William Hyatte, Kory Breaton and others
Not Classified By Court:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Francisco M Vazquez
Defendant:
Mark Kauffman, Derrick Bowlby, Luke Beaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Warden

as 3:2023cv00787
Petitioner:
Michael D Wall
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. USA
as 2:2023cv00286
Petitioner:
Michael Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.