General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Before Judge James Moody
Cases 1 - 10 of 344
Hampton v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00445
Petitioner: Kelvin Hampton
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00404
Petitioner: Taurus Butler
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner: Rickey R Armour
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrett v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00331
Petitioner: Ishmell Neal Garrett
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00230
Petitioner: Larry Randolph
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sowder v. Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00106
Petitioner: Robert Sowder
Respondent: Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sowder v. Sheriff
as 3:2024cv00227
Petitioner: Robert Sowder
Respondent: Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00145
Petitioner: Brion B Smith
Respondent: Warden
Not Yet Classified: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cochran v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00121
Petitioner: Michael J Cochran, Sr and Michael Cochran, Sr
Respondent: Warden
Not Yet Classified: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00106
Petitioner: Carlos Robinson
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?