Cases 41 - 50 of 650
Wilkerson v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00901
Petitioner:
Ty Wilkerson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00892
Petitioner:
Troy Wright
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buggs v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00890
Petitioner:
Marshaun Buggs
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00872
Petitioner:
Audrain Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maymon v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00854
Petitioner:
Darrell M Maymon
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00763
Petitioner:
Joshua Lewis
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitfield El v. Sheriff
as 3:2022cv00760
Petitioner:
Lawrence Whitfield El and Lawrence Whitfield
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weaver v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00695
Petitioner:
Donald Weaver and Donald E Weaver
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weinley v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00681
Petitioner:
Timothy D Weinley
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peters v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00651
Petitioner:
Fred Peters
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
