Cases 51 - 60 of 4,098
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Martin v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Rhett A Martin
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
De La Rosa v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Linda De La Rosa
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pello v. Centerion et al
as 3:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
James Michael Pello
Defendant:
Centerion, Pam Cool, Kim Meyers and others
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finnegan v. Sarber et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan and Russell Finnegan
Defendant:
Matthew E Sarber, Michael A Shurn, JoLynn Behny and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flood v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Patrick Flood and Patrick S Flood
Defendant:
William Hyatte, Joshua Snow, Lorna Harbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Menard Inc
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joyce A Richardson
Defendant:
Menard Inc doing business as Menards
Other:
Galen Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
McGowan v. Tchaptchet et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Thomas Patrick McGowan
Defendant:
Tchaptchet, Cheryl and Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGowan v. Tchaptchet et al
as 3:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Thomas Patrick McGowan
Defendant:
Tchaptchet, Cheryl and Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
