Cases 151 - 160 of 1,488
Shaver v. Meyers et al
as 3:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Trevion Shaver
Defendant:
Meyers, Moore, Merrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Gladiux et al
as 1:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
William L Manning
Defendant:
Gladiux, Confinment Officer, Kitchen Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson v. Miller et al
as 3:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jefferson
Defendant:
Robert L Miller, Jr, S Jarrell and Chanda J Berta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Fahl
as 1:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph West
Defendant:
Douglas Fahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stacy v. Wabash National
as 4:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
KYLE LEE STACY
Defendant:
Wabash National Corporation and Wabash National
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00648
Defendant:
Wardlow, Ron Neal, Warlow and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique D Clark
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Christensen et al
as 2:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Channing Lamonte Scott
Defendant:
Derek Christensen, Galipeau and Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00534
Petitioner:
McConney George
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00525
Petitioner:
Timothy Collins
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
Jaron Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
