Cases 121 - 130 of 730
Bell v. Brickner et al
as 2:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Lamont Trumane Bell
Defendant:
Brickner, Brian John and Brain John
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittenburg v. Warden et al
as 2:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Garrett Whittenburg
Defendant:
Warden, Terrieonne Peterson, Johnnie Luellin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCloud-Smith v. Sormaz et al
as 2:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Charles McCloud-Smith
Defendant:
Pete Sormaz, Ernest Norgle, Steve McNamara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartole v. Tippecanoe County et al
as 2:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Bartole
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County, Bob Goldsmith, Sarah Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Officer et al
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Marcus Lorenzo Jones
Defendant:
Officer, Officers, Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craft v. Garza et al
as 2:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Fredrick David Craft
Defendant:
Garza, Knotts and Gary Police Department
Not Classified By Court:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Gladieux et al
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Scott M Martin
Defendant:
Gladieux, Kock and QCC nursing staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Huntsman et al
as 2:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
Peter R Huntsman and Hub Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartole v. Hughes et al
as 2:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Bartole
Defendant:
Shay Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. State of Indiana et al
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Gary M Conner
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Bill Brooks, Don Munson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
