Cases 81 - 90 of 192
Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland v. Slurry Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00023
Defendant:
Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland , Slurry Systems Inc , Dana Wesolek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norfolk & Southern Railway Company v. Soo Line Railroad Company et al
as 2:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Company , Indiana Harbor Belt Railway Company The and Consolidated Rail Corporation The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Magnesita Refractories Company v. Mishra
as 2:2016cv00524
Plaintiff:
Magnesita Refractories Company
Defendant:
Surendra Mishra
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
American Honda Finance Corporation v. Westlake Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00510
Plaintiff:
American Honda Finance Corporation
Defendant:
Westlake Inc., Gregg Foster and Lloyd Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pegg v. Nexus RVs LLC
as 3:2016cv00783
Plaintiff:
Steve Pegg
Defendant:
Nexus RVs LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Murphy et al v. Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kevin Murphy and Julie Murphy
Defendant:
Freightliner Custom Chassis Corporation and REV Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Hunt v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 2:2016cv00459
Plaintiff:
Joyce Hunt
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Wesolek
as 2:2016cv00443
Plaintiff:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Defendant:
Bryan J Wesolek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kevin Applegate et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00704
Plaintiff:
Kevin Applegate and Amy Applegate
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Powell-Christensen, Inc. v iRely LLC
as 1:2016cv00341
Defendant:
iRely LLC
Plaintiff:
Powell-Christensen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
