Cases 21 - 30 of 629
Ferch v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00785
Petitioner:
Jonathan Ferch
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00763
Petitioner:
Billy H Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00765
Petitioner:
Billy H Brown and Billy Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00762
Petitioner:
Billy H Brown and Billy Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crain v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00710
Petitioner:
Durell T Crain and Durell Crain
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00534
Petitioner:
McConney George
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00525
Petitioner:
Timothy Collins
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00112
Petitioner:
Bryan Lee Jordan
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tiller v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00064
Petitioner:
Robert Cornelius Tiller and Robert C Tiller
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bartole v. Sheriff
as 2:2022cv00319
Petitioner:
Marcus T. Bartole and Marcus Trevor Bartole
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
