Cases 1 - 10 of 4,415
Williams v. Morales
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Morales
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallahan v. Rayl et al
as 3:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joesph Hallahan
Defendant:
Kevin Rayl, Justin Bertrand, Johnathan Crow-Eby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dunigan v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00329
Petitioner:
Lee Evans Dunigan
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finnegan v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Defendant:
LeAnn Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penick v. Rush et al
as 3:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Justin L Penick
Defendant:
Rush, English, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaver v. Captain Z et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Trevion Shaver
Defendant:
Captain Z, Stockbridge and Wendy Vanarsdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcfadden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ebony Nicole Mcfadden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brown v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00119
Petitioner:
Terrance Brown and Terrance A Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilburn v. Reagle et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tyrell Wilburn and Anthony T Wilburn
Defendant:
Christina Reagle, Ron Neal, David Liebel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
