Cases 111 - 120 of 253
Flatt et al v. Carson et al
as 2:2013cv00386
Plaintiff:
David Flatt and Debra Flatt
Defendant:
Teresa Carson and Coca-Cola Refreshments USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Messenger v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2013cv01098
Plaintiff:
Richard Messenger
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Rogers et al v. Ross et al
as 3:2013cv01055
Plaintiff:
Debra Rogers , Debora Canada , Elizabeth Ross and others
Defendant:
Patrick J Hagerty and Penske Truck Leasing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Esslinger v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00961
Plaintiff:
Jane Esslinger
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc, Zimmer Holdings Inc and Zimmer Orthopedic Surgical Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00967
Plaintiff:
Deloris Johnson
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc, Zimmer Holdings Inc and Zimmer Orthopedic Surgical Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McIntosh v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00972
Plaintiff:
Teresa L McIntosh
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc, Zimmer Holdings Inc and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leal v. TSA Stores Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
Michelle Leal
Defendant:
TSA Stores Inc , Urban Express Assembly LLC and East Coast Cycle Supply Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Adkisson v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
Steven Adkisson
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc, Zimmer Holdings Inc and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westfall v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2013cv00926
Plaintiff:
Dale J Westfall
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 56
Bogan v. Kawasaki Motors Corporation USA
as 1:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
William Bogan
Defendant:
Kawasaki Motors Corporation USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
