Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Davis et al v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 2:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
Eric S Davis, John H Davis and Shelia D Davis
Defendant:
EDWARD L ALLEY, ROY MOORE, DOUGLAS L PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Hollowell v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership
as 2:2019cv00481
Defendant:
Meijer Stores Limited Partnership, John Does 1-10, Roe Corporations 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Hollowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradburn v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00925
Defendant:
DOES 1- 10, inclusive, Bard Access Systems Inc and CR Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Ramos et al
as 3:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Jerilynn Langwith, Daniel J Waterhouse, Uber Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Cameron Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wohlleber v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02002
Plaintiff:
Edward Wohlleber
Defendant:
Biomet Inc and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Napier v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01880
Plaintiff:
Sheryl D Napier
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chisolm v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01647
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Chisolm
Defendant:
Biomet Inc and John Does 1-10
Zurek v. American Express et al
as 2:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Ron Zurek
Defendant:
American Express and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Antler v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC
as 3:2014cv00754
Plaintiff:
Steven J Antler
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neal et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00758
Plaintiff:
Lena Neal and Charlie Neal
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
