Cases 141 - 150 of 11,385
Gary v. Elkhart County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Tervarus L Gary
Defendant:
Elkhart County Sheriffs Department, Jeff Segal and Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Megan
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Baker
Defendant:
Megan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary v. Elkhart County Work Release et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Tervarus L Gary
Defendant:
Elkhart County Work Release, Board of Directors, Helfan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant:
Katie, Warden, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harp v. Quality Correctional Care LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Care LLC, Allen County Sheriff, Quality Correctional LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Eric David Harp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorman v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
Schmidt, Liaw and Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGruder v. Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Makiyah McGruder
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sowder v. Elkhart County Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Robert Sowder
Defendant:
Elkhart County Indiana, Vicki Elaine Becker, Goshen Public Defender Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Rhett A Martin
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrett v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00331
Petitioner:
Ishmell Neal Garrett
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
