Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Adams v. Tague et al
as 1:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
Marlin Adams
Defendant:
L Wilker and L Tague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Butler et al
as 1:2021cv00083
Defendant:
Nurse Serena, Cpl Butler and C.O. Morgan
Plaintiff:
Marlin Delvon Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Stump et al
as 1:2021cv00077
Defendant:
Penny Lake, Alan D Cook, Scott Sanderson and others
Plaintiff:
Donte Curry
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardesty v. Marshall County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00111
Defendant:
Bo Holmcomb, Rosalez, Zac McGugian and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Hardesty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. LaPorte County of Indiana et al
as 3:2020cv01056
Defendant:
John Lake, Michael S Bergerson, LaPorte County of Indiana and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. LaPorte Indiana County of et al
as 3:2020cv01003
Defendant:
Jimerson, John Lake, Tiger Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Villages of Hanna et al
as 3:2020cv00971
Defendant:
Thomas L Strausberger, Adam Mildred, France C Gull and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Bryan L Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. The Geo Group et al
as 3:2020cv00952
Defendant:
Wexford of Indiana, Moore, Mr Newkirk and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Danny R Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Adams et al
as 1:2020cv00383
Defendant:
Justin M Gore, Kyle G Schram, Joshua P Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2020cv00855
Defendant:
Mark J Roule, Michael Bergerson and Indiana State of
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
