Cases 81 - 90 of 932
Moriarity v. USA
as 1:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
Jeffrey J Moriarity
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lenoir v. USA
as 3:2022cv00711
Petitioner:
Ramon Lenoir
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Taylor v. USPTO et al
as 3:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel I Taylor and Ezekiel I Taylor, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO, United States Patent Trademark Office and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. USA
as 3:2022cv00715
Petitioner:
Andre Neal
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez v. USA
as 2:2022cv00231
Petitioner:
Rafael Roman Ramirez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Duncan v. USA
as 3:2022cv00643
Petitioner:
Darrell L Duncan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Egan v. USA
as 3:2022cv00564
Petitioner:
Crystal Egan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Beck v. USA
as 2:2022cv00194
Petitioner:
Leeroy Hayes Beck
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bledson v. USA
as 2:2022cv00196
Petitioner:
Jerry Bledson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fowler v. USA
as 3:2022cv00527
Petitioner:
Donyea Fowler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
